Case 9: Multi-Touch Attribution with Retargeting
Case 9: Multi-Touch Attribution Analysis: Sales with Retargeting
Section titled “Case 9: Multi-Touch Attribution Analysis: Sales with Retargeting”Context
Section titled “Context”You have sales data and want to understand which campaigns actually drive revenue
The Challenge
Section titled “The Challenge”Users don’t convert in a straight line:
- They land from paid ad
- Leave without purchasing
- Get retargeted via SMS
- Click SMS, still don’t purchase
- Get retargeted via email
- Click email, still don’t purchase
- Visit directly and finally purchase
Question: Which campaign gets credit?
The Analysis Process
Section titled “The Analysis Process”Step 1: Query Sales Data
Section titled “Step 1: Query Sales Data”Using your attribution system (Moon, PostHog, etc.):
- Pull all sales transactions
- For each sale, get the customer email
Step 2: Match Sales to Leads
Section titled “Step 2: Match Sales to Leads”- Each sale has an email (e.g.,
sarah@example.com) - Look up lead record for that email
- Lead record has original UTM parameters from first landing
Step 3: Attribute to Original Source
Section titled “Step 3: Attribute to Original Source”Sale → Email Match → Lead Record → Original UTM Parameters
Transaction $499 ↓sarah@example.com ↓Lead (created 2025-11-21) ↓campaign_id: 120236311971890504affid: 1000utm_source: fblanding_page: /medication-tirzepatide-discount-01Result: Sale attributed to Facebook campaign, even if final conversion came from SMS/email/direct
Real Example: Double Retargeting Attribution
Section titled “Real Example: Double Retargeting Attribution”Customer Journey Discovered
Section titled “Customer Journey Discovered”-
Initial landing (Facebook campaign, affid 1000)
- Captured email:
user@example.com - Became lead, didn’t purchase
- Captured email:
-
SMS retargeting (3 days later)
- Clicked SMS link
- Visited site, didn’t purchase
- System logged: SMS click for
user@example.com
-
Email retargeting (5 days later)
- Clicked email link
- Visited site, didn’t purchase
- System logged: Email click for
user@example.com
-
Final purchase (7 days later)
- Made purchase: $499
- Email on transaction:
user@example.com
Attribution Analysis Shows
Section titled “Attribution Analysis Shows”- Original source: Facebook campaign 120236311971890504, affid 1000
- Middle touches: SMS retargeting, Email retargeting
- Final touch: Direct or email (last click before purchase)
- Credit for acquisition: Facebook campaign
Why You Can See This
Section titled “Why You Can See This”- The system had initial data stored from Day 1 (when they first landed)
- Email connects all touchpoints
- Lead record preserves original UTM parameters
- Sale record matches to lead via email
- All touchpoint events tagged with user identifier
What This Reveals
Section titled “What This Reveals”Campaign Performance with Nurture
Section titled “Campaign Performance with Nurture”Campaign 120236311971890504 (Full Journey Analysis):
Immediate conversions (0-1 day):- Sales: 45- Revenue: $22,455- Conversion: 1.3% of leads
With SMS retargeting (2-7 days):- Sales: 82- Revenue: $40,918- Conversion: 2.4% of leads
With Email retargeting (2-14 days):- Sales: 48- Revenue: $23,952- Conversion: 1.4% of leads
Other touchpoints:- Sales: 12- Revenue: $5,988
Total attributed to campaign:- Sales: 187- Revenue: $93,313- Conversion: 5.5% of leads- ROAS: 9.3xKey Insight
Section titled “Key Insight”- Only 24% of sales convert immediately
- 76% require retargeting (SMS/email)
- But ALL 187 sales originated from the same Facebook campaign
- Without that campaign, you wouldn’t have those leads to retarget
Traffic Source Analysis (Affid)
Section titled “Traffic Source Analysis (Affid)”Checking sales by affid (traffic source identifier)
Section titled “Checking sales by affid (traffic source identifier)”Affid 1000 (Facebook):- Leads generated: 5,200- Sales (all touchpoints): 420- Revenue: $209,580- Average days to convert: 6.3- Touchpoints before sale: 3.2 average
Affid 2000 (Google):- Leads generated: 2,100- Sales (all touchpoints): 98- Revenue: $48,902- Average days to convert: 4.1- Touchpoints before sale: 2.5 averageInsight
Section titled “Insight”- Facebook (affid 1000) drives more volume and higher-quality leads
- Google converts faster with fewer touchpoints
- Both benefit from SMS/email retargeting
How You Instantly See This
Section titled “How You Instantly See This””Not magical tools, just knowing what to check”
Section titled “”Not magical tools, just knowing what to check””What you did:
- Opened attribution system (Moon/PostHog/etc.)
- Queried: “Show me sales with original traffic source”
- Instantly saw results with campaign IDs, affids, UTM parameters
Why it was instant:
- Data connections already exist in the system
- Leads were captured with UTM parameters on Day 1
- Sales matched to leads via email automatically
- Query just exposes existing relationships
The “magic” is not the tool - it’s:
- Knowing to ask “What was their ORIGINAL source?” (not last click)
- Understanding the data structure (Sales → Leads → UTM)
- Having systems properly configured (attribution chain intact)
Principles Applied
Section titled “Principles Applied”- End-to-End Attribution is Non-Negotiable ✓
- First-Touch Attribution is Sacred ✓
- PII is the Attribution Anchor ✓ (email connects everything)
- Know What You Want to Check ✓
What You Need in Your System
Section titled “What You Need in Your System”- First-touch capture: Original UTM parameters stored with lead
- User identification: Email/phone as primary identifier
- Event tracking: All touchpoints logged (SMS clicks, email clicks, site visits)
- Sale connection: Transaction email matches to lead email
- Attribution query: Tool can show sales with original source
PostHog does this: User profiles maintain original properties, all events connected Moon does this: Attribution platform designed for this exact use case Most modern tools do this: It’s table stakes in 2025
If your system can’t show this, get a better system.
Navigation
Section titled “Navigation”- Previous: Case 8: Traffic Quality Persistence
- Next: Case 10: Sales Investigation
- Back to Index: All Cases